Forum pour les qualifs français ETC

Toute la saison, lisez le site web de l'association FEQ40K pour retrouver news, classements, ressources ... (conventions FR updatées)
Suite à l'AG, l'élection du nouveau Bureau aura lieu à partir du 3 juillet 2017. Vous pouvez voter ici. /span>

  • Poster un nouveau sujet
  • Répondre au sujet

Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Partagez
avatar
madBiker
Porte-parole au conseil ETC

Messages : 2808
Date d'inscription : 28/07/2013
Age : 103
Localisation : Toulouse

Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par madBiker le Jeu 3 Sep - 21:40

Rappel du premier message :

Voici le vote au conseil etc qui se profile pour faire évoluer de maniere majeure le format etc.
Ce sujet à pour but de sonder la communauté FR pour composer le vote France au conseil ETC

Trois choses importantes :
Le vote est très long. Merci de faire une synthèse digeste sur une ligne du type "1) A 2) C 3) B ...". Le gars qui dépouillera vous remercie. Évitez absolument de citer le message initial.

Ne postez ici que votre vote. Pour le débat, il y a le sujet "le futur du format".

Essayez de donner votre avis pour le 12 Septembre.

Voici la bête:

Ok guys this is the big one for 2015-2016. Below are the questions outlined for the vote for 2015-2016 armycomp restrictions so we can get right into it and prepare for the coming year. You have until Thursday to suggest changes, Thursday evening the vote goes live. We are revoting on older issues again as well because with potentially opening things up nuances might change and we thought it best to include them again to avoid any misgivings about that later in the year. Once we get all the army comp stuff out of the way we can have a look at mission design. If you have anything to say regarding feel free to open up a topic for discussion.

1. Factions on the team level
a) Every faction only once per team. This means that the Eldar Faction can only ever be present in any single armylist within a given team
b) Every faction can be present twice per team. Once as a primary detachment and once as another type of detachment *
*** If this option is chosen further restriction votes on the team level will follow

2. Number of detachments at the player level.
a) stick to 2
b) change the number of detachments at the player level – see item 3 –

3. Indicate how many detachments (from 1-5) you would like an army to field maximally. All numbers will be counted and an average will be made, rounding up. An average of 5 will amount to unlimited detachments allowed.

4. Will we allow a given single players army to field several same faction detachments or dataslates?
a) Yes – see question 5 -
b) No

5. Only to be taken into account when option 4A is chosen as a majority
a) Only allow it when one of the Detachments is a formation or dataslate
b) Allow regardless of the type of Detachment that is chosen

6. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow duplicate CAD Detachments within a given army *
b) Allow duplicate CAD Detachments within a given army ONLY if they are of a different faction *
c) Do not allow duplicate CAD Detachments within a given army *
*** Combined votes of a and b will be compared to total votes for c to see if duplicate CAD will be allowed or not

7. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow duplicate formations to be taken within a given army
b) Allow duplicate formations to be taken within a given army but only as part of a Decurion or Warhost type of Detachment
c) Do not allow ANY duplicate formations not even as part of a Decurion or Warhost type of Detachment

8. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow duplicate Allied Detachments within a given army *
b) Allow duplicate Allied Detachments within a given army ONLY if they are of a different faction *
c) Do not allow duplicate Allied Detachments within a given army *
*** Combined votes of a and b will be compared to total votes for c to see if duplicate Allied Detachments will be allowed or not

9. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow several Dataslates within a given army *
b) Allow several Dataslates within a given army ONLY if they are of a different faction *
c) Do not allow more than one Dataslate within a given army *
*** Combined votes of a and b will be compared to total votes for c to see how dataslates will be restricted. Dataslates that can be induced into an army as an HQ choice or such like Belakor or Cypher, do not count for the purpose of this vote.

10. Will we play with Super Heavy Vehicles or Gargantuan Creatures at the ETC?
a) Yes
b) No

11. Only valid if option 10a is chosen
a) No further restrictions on the amount of Gargantuan Creatures per army or team
b) Restrictive amount of Gargantuan Creatures per army or team

12. Only valid if option 11b was chosen
a) restrictions based on amount of GC on the team or army level
b) restrictions based on the type of GC on the team or army level

13. only valid if option 12a was chosen
a) Restrict amount of Gargantuans on the team level – see question 14
b) Restrict amount of Gargantuans on the army level – see question 15

14. Only valid if option 13a is chosen
a) maximum 1 Gargantuan Creature per team
b) maximum 2 Gargantuan Creatures per team
c) maximum 3 Gargantuan Creatures per team
d) more than 3 allowed per team

15. Only valid if option 13b is chosen
a) maximum 1 GC per army
b) maximum 2 GC per army
c) maximum 3 GC per army
d) more than 3 allowed per army

16. claryfing vote for vote 15
a) Only 1 Gargantuan Creature of a certain type per army
b) Only 2 Gargantuan Creatures of a certain type per army
c) more than 2 GC of a certain type per army

17. Only valid if option 10a is chosen
a) No further restrictions on the amount of SHV per army or team
b) Restrictive amount of SHV per army or team

18. Only valid if option 17b was chosen
a) restrictions based on amount of SHV on the team or army level
b) restrictions based on the type of SHV on the team or army level

19. only valid if option 18a was chosen
a) Restrict amount of SHV on the team level – see question 20
b) Restrict amount of SHV on the army level – see question 21

20. Only valid if option 19a is chosen
a) maximum 1 SHV per team
b) maximum 2 SHV per team
c) maximum 3 SHV per team
d) more than 3 allowed per team

21. Only valid if option 19b is chosen
a) maximum 1 SHV per army
b) maximum 2 SHV per army
c) maximum 3 SHV per army
d) more than 3 allowed per army

22. claryfing vote for vote 21
a) Only 1 SHV of a certain type per army
b) Only 2 SHV of a certain type per army
c) more than 2 SHV of a certain type per army

23. Will we allow Dataslates at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

24. Will we allow White Dwarf Entries at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

25. Will we allow online only formations like the Skyhammer Formation at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

26. Will we allow the use of Campain Book entries at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

27. Will we allow the use of Escalation book entries at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

28. Will we allow the use of Stronghold Assault at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

29. Shall we adjust the pointsize (1850) played at the ETC?
a) Yes
b) No

30. Only valid if 29a was chosen as an option
a) 1750 pts
b) 1650 pts
c) 1500 pts

31. Use ETC WFB 2015 pairing process ( voir le sujet dédié sur ce forum qui explique cette proposition)
a/ yes
b/ no, use ETC 40k 2015 pairing process

32. Add terrain (je pense qu'il voulait dire "table") choice by players who have been put forward in the WFB pairing process
a/ yes
b/ no
As soon as this vote is over, a new vote will be set up to discuss the fineprint from vote 23-30, as well as votes around missiondesign and the pairing process.


Bon vote!


Dernière édition par madBiker le Ven 2 Oct - 14:26, édité 2 fois (Raison : ajout Q31/32)
avatar
Fenryll

Messages : 843
Date d'inscription : 09/12/2010
Age : 39

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Fenryll le Sam 5 Sep - 13:18

Edit madbiker : **** FROUTCH **** pas les commentaires ici, voir tous les posts précédents
avatar
MEGALODON

Messages : 458
Date d'inscription : 01/07/2015

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par MEGALODON le Sam 5 Sep - 18:07

1)A ; 2)B ; 3)4 ; 4)A ; 5)B ; 6)C ; 7)B ; 8)B ; 9)A ; 10)A ; 11)B ; 12)A ; 13)A ; 14)C ; 15)A ; 16)A ; 18)B ; 19)B ; 20)C ; 21)D ; 22)A ; 23)A ; 24)A ; 25)A ; 26)A ; 27)B ; 28)B ; 29)B ; 30)A ; 31)A ; 32)B

itachi03

Messages : 2
Date d'inscription : 05/09/2015

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par itachi03 le Sam 5 Sep - 19:45

1)a
2)a
3)2
4)b
5)a
6)c
7)c
8)c
9)c
10)b
11)b
12)b
13)a
14)a
15)a
16)a
17)b
18)b
19)a
20)a
21)a
22)a
23)b
24)a
25)a
26)b
27)b
28)b
29)b
30)a
31)b
32)a

edit madBiker : VOTE A REMETTRE EN FORME
avatar
Isenheim

Messages : 789
Date d'inscription : 13/08/2014

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Isenheim le Dim 6 Sep - 19:32

1. a)

2. a)

3. Just 2 detachments (and fuck Unbound)

4.a)

5. c)

6. 4 b) again. However, we will never cross the CAD.

7. a)
And, 7 b) is a stupid answer. Duplicate formations MUST be always allowed in a Warhost or a Decurion. It's a special kind of detachment.

8. b)

9.c) Do not allow more than one Dataslate within a given army

10. a)

11. b)

12. b)

13. b)

14. I've said 13 b).

15. a)

16. a) Only 1 Gargantuan Creature of a certain type per army (I can't be more understandable)

17. b)

18. b)

19. b)

20. I've said 19 b)

21. a) One big per army.

22. a) One big per army.

23. a)

24. a)

25. a)

26. a)

27. b) It's a crap.

28. b) It's the other crap.

29. b) I've more than 8k points of armies. And I want play with it.

30. Fuck you. 1850 forever.

31. b)

32. b) It's a waste of time. And it piss me off.

edit madBiker : VOTE A REMETTRE EN FORME

Olohme40
Grand modérateur

Messages : 1508
Date d'inscription : 23/01/2011

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Olohme40 le Dim 6 Sep - 20:46

1)a2)a3)b4)no5)a6)c7)c8)c9)c10)a11)b12)a13)a14)c15)c16)c17)b18)a19)a20)c21)c22)c23)a24)a25)a26)a27)b28)a29)a30)b31)a32)a


Dernière édition par Olohme40 le Lun 7 Sep - 7:29, édité 2 fois
avatar
madBiker
Porte-parole au conseil ETC

Messages : 2808
Date d'inscription : 28/07/2013
Age : 103
Localisation : Toulouse

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par madBiker le Dim 6 Sep - 23:28

La raison pour laquelle je demande des mises en forme spécifiques c'est pour pouvoir dépouiller plus facilement. Alors oui c'est moche, mais svp mettez vos réponses sur une seule ligne. Merci d'avance.

Lol_MWF

Messages : 16
Date d'inscription : 27/06/2015

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Lol_MWF le Lun 7 Sep - 0:03

1)a 2)a 3)3 4)a 5)a 6)c 7)b 8)b 9)c 10)a 11)b 12)a 13)b 14)- 15)a 16)a 17)b 18)a 19)b 20)- 21)a 22)a 23)a no 24)b no 25)b 26)a no 27)a no 28)a no 29)a 30)b 31)a 32)a
avatar
toorop

Messages : 332
Date d'inscription : 21/08/2014

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par toorop le Mar 8 Sep - 12:22

1.a) 2.b) 3.5) 4.a) 5. b) 6.b) 7.b) 8.b) 9.a) 10.a) 11.b) 12.a) 13.b) 14.a) 15.a) 16.a) 17.b) 18 a) 19.b) 20.a) 21.a) 22.a) 23.a) 24.a) 25.b) 26.a) 27.b) 28.a) 29.a) 30.a)

a voté

Bubbamix38
Secrétaire de l'association

Messages : 577
Date d'inscription : 16/05/2013

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Bubbamix38 le Mar 8 Sep - 12:27


1) A ; 2) B ; 3) 5 ; 4) A ; 5) A ; 6) C ; 7)B ; 8 ) B ; 9) B ; 10) A ; 11) B ; 12) A ; 13) A ; 14) C ; 15) A ; 16) A ; 17) B ; 18) A ; 19) A ; 20) C ; 21) C ; 22) C ; 23) A ; 24) A ; 25) A ; 26) A ; 27) A ; 28) A ; 29) B ; 30) A ; 31) A ; 32 ) B
avatar
Svenito

Messages : 1050
Date d'inscription : 23/06/2015
Age : 29

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Svenito le Mar 8 Sep - 12:45

1) A ; 2) B ; 3) 5 ; 4) A ; 5) A ; 6) C ; 7)B ; 8 ) B ; 9) B ; 10) A ; 11) B ; 12) A ; 13) A ; 14) C ; 15) A ; 16) A ; 17) B ; 18) A ; 19) A ; 20) C ; 21) C ; 22) C ; 23) A ; 24) A ; 25) A ; 26) A ; 27) A ; 28) A ; 29) B ; 30) A ; 31) A ; 32 ) B

Belgarion43

Messages : 16
Date d'inscription : 16/08/2015

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Belgarion43 le Mar 8 Sep - 18:19

1)A; 2)B; 3)5; 4)A; 5)A; 6)C; 7)B; 8)B; 9)B; 10)A; 11)B; 12)A; 13)B; 14)D; 15)D; 16)C; 17)B; 18)A; 19)B; 20)D; 21)D; 22)C; 23)A; 24)A; 25)A; 26)A; 27)B; 28)B; 29)B; 30)A; 31)B; 32)B
avatar
Le Gob

Messages : 685
Date d'inscription : 07/05/2013
Age : 28
Localisation : Chambéry

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Le Gob le Mar 8 Sep - 19:47

1. a 2. b  3. 3 4. a 5. b 6. c 7. b 8. c 9. a 10.a 11.b 12.b 13.b 14.d 15.d  16.a  17.b 18.b  19.a  20.d 21.d 22.a  23.a  24.a 25.a 26.a  27.b 28.a  29.b 30.a 31.a 32.a


A quand Forgeworld Very Happy
edit madbiker : fyi certains pays l'ont proposé ... mais trop minoritaire pour l'instant (bien que par exemple joué aux US)
Le Gob,

A voté !


_________________
Make The D1 Great Again !
avatar
MrPlot

Messages : 80
Date d'inscription : 25/02/2013

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par MrPlot le Mer 9 Sep - 10:04

1. a) ; 2. b) ; 3. 5; 4. a) ; 5. b) ; 6. a) ; 7. b) ; 8. a) ; 9. a) ; 10. a) ; 11. b) ; 12. a) ; 13. b) ; 14. a) ; 15. a) ; 16. a) ; 17. b) ; 18. a) ; 19. b) ; 20. d) ; 21. d) ; 22. c) ; 23. a) ; 24. a) ; 25. a) ; 26. a) ; 27. a) ; 28. a) ; 29. a) ; 30. c)


_________________
Machotyran
avatar
Legourou

Messages : 79
Date d'inscription : 16/06/2013

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Legourou le Mer 9 Sep - 10:08

Tout pareil que Tutur

1. a) ; 2. b) ; 3. 5; 4. a) ; 5. b) ; 6. a) ; 7. b) ; 8. a) ; 9. a) ; 10. a) ; 11. b) ; 12. a) ; 13. b) ; 14. a) ; 15. a) ; 16. a) ; 17. b) ; 18. a) ; 19. b) ; 20. d) ; 21. d) ; 22. c) ; 23. a) ; 24. a) ; 25. a) ; 26. a) ; 27. a) ; 28. a) ; 29. a) ; 30. c)

Ashyra

Messages : 11
Date d'inscription : 09/12/2014

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Ashyra le Jeu 10 Sep - 9:12

1.b) 2.b) 3.5) 4.a) 5.b) 6.a) 7.a) 8.a) 9.a) 10.a) 11.a) 12.a) 13.b) 14.d) 15.d) 16.c) 17.a) 18.a) 19.b) 20.d) 21.d) 22.c) 23.a) 24.a) 25.a) 26.a) 27.a) 28.a) 29.a) 30.c) 31.a) 32.a)
avatar
Graou

Messages : 6
Date d'inscription : 02/07/2012
Age : 26
Localisation : Belfort

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Graou le Jeu 10 Sep - 9:30

1)A ; 2)B ; 3)4 ; 4)A ; 5)B ; 6)C ; 7)B ; 8)B ; 9)A ; 10)A ; 11)B ; 12)A ; 13)A ; 14)C ; 15)A ; 16)A ; 18)B ; 19)B ; 20)C ; 21)D ; 22)A ; 23)A ; 24)A ; 25)A ; 26)A ; 27)B ; 28)B ; 29)B ; 30)A ; 31)A ; 32)B

FracassorSenior

Messages : 1
Date d'inscription : 12/09/2015

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par FracassorSenior le Sam 12 Sep - 11:41


1.a); 2.b); 3.3; 4.a); 5.b); 6.a); 7.b); 8.c); 9.c); 10.b); 11.b); 12.a); 13.a); 14.a); 15.a); 16.a); 17.b); 18.a); 19. a); 20.a); 21.a); 22.a); 23.a); 24.a); 25.a); 26.a); 27.b); 28.a); 29.b); 30.a); 31.b); 32.a

avatar
kaleth

Messages : 6
Date d'inscription : 22/08/2015

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par kaleth le Sam 12 Sep - 20:48

1. b / 2. b / 3. 3 / 4. b / 5. a / 6. a / 7. a / 8. a / 9 a / 10. a / 11. b / 12 a / 13. a / 14. a / 15. a / 16. a / 17. b / 18. a / 19. a / 20. a / 21. a / 22. a / 23. a / 24. a / 25. b / 26. a / 27. a / 28. a / 29. b / 30. a / 31. a / 32. a
avatar
Chestnut

Messages : 179
Date d'inscription : 05/06/2013

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Chestnut le Sam 12 Sep - 21:40

1. a) ; 2. b) ; 3. 5; 4. a) ; 5. b) ; 6. a) ; 7. b) ; 8. a) ; 9. a) ; 10. a) ; 11. b) ; 12. a) ; 13. b) ; 14. a) ; 15. a) ; 16. a) ; 17. b) ; 18. a) ; 19. b) ; 20. d) ; 21. d) ; 22. c) ; 23. a) ; 24. a) ; 25. a) ; 26. a) ; 27. a) ; 28. a) ; 29. a) ; 30. c)
avatar
madBiker
Porte-parole au conseil ETC

Messages : 2808
Date d'inscription : 28/07/2013
Age : 103
Localisation : Toulouse

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par madBiker le Sam 12 Sep - 23:40

thread locké le temps du comptage.
avatar
madBiker
Porte-parole au conseil ETC

Messages : 2808
Date d'inscription : 28/07/2013
Age : 103
Localisation : Toulouse

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par madBiker le Dim 13 Sep - 0:26

Résultat du sondage.
Je rappelle que ceci n'est rien qu'un sondage et que l'important, c'est ce qui sortira du vote ETC en cours, résultat d'ici 2 semaines environ.
Je n'ai compté que les votes correctement formattés, j'avais prévenu, sinon c'est trop long à dépouiller.
Le résultat en gras est celui majoritaire.


1. Factions on the team level
a) Every faction only once per team. This means that the Eldar Faction can only ever be present in any single armylist within a given team
b) Every faction can be present twice per team. Once as a primary detachment and once as another type of detachment *
*** If this option is chosen further restriction votes on the team level will follow

37 A ; 2 B

2. Number of detachments at the player level.
a) stick to 2
b) change the number of detachments at the player level – see item 3 –


7 A ; 32 B

3. Indicate how many detachments (from 1-5) you would like an army to field maximally. All numbers will be counted and an average will be made, rounding up. An average of 5 will amount to unlimited detachments allowed.

1: 2 , 2: 1, 3: 10, 4: 2, 5: 16
Moyenne pondérée de 3,93 soit presque 4.

4. Will we allow a given single players army to field several same faction detachments or dataslates?
a) Yes – see question 5 -
b) No

33 A ; 5 B

5. Only to be taken into account when option 4A is chosen as a majority
a) Only allow it when one of the Detachments is a formation or dataslate
b) Allow regardless of the type of Detachment that is chosen

16 A ; 23 B

6. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow duplicate CAD Detachments within a given army *
b) Allow duplicate CAD Detachments within a given army ONLY if they are of a different faction *
c) Do not allow duplicate CAD Detachments within a given army *
*** Combined votes of a and b will be compared to total votes for c to see if duplicate CAD will be allowed or not

11 A ; 7 B ; 20 C , A + B < C

7. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow duplicate formations to be taken within a given army
b) Allow duplicate formations to be taken within a given army but only as part of a Decurion or Warhost type of Detachment
c) Do not allow ANY duplicate formations not even as part of a Decurion or Warhost type of Detachment

Q7: 6 A ; 27 B ; 5 C


8. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow duplicate Allied Detachments within a given army *
b) Allow duplicate Allied Detachments within a given army ONLY if they are of a different faction *
c) Do not allow duplicate Allied Detachments within a given army *
*** Combined votes of a and b will be compared to total votes for c to see if duplicate Allied Detachments will be allowed or not

12 A ; 14 B ; 12 C ; A+B > C


9. Only to be taken into account when option 5b is chosen
a) Allow several Dataslates within a given army *
b) Allow several Dataslates within a given army ONLY if they are of a different faction *
c) Do not allow more than one Dataslate within a given army *
*** Combined votes of a and b will be compared to total votes for c to see how dataslates will be restricted. Dataslates that can be induced into an army as an HQ choice or such like Belakor or Cypher, do not count for the purpose of this vote.

20 A ; 5 B ; 14 C ; A+B > C


10. Will we play with Super Heavy Vehicles or Gargantuan Creatures at the ETC?
a) Yes
b) No

30 A ; 9 B

11. Only valid if option 10a is chosen
a) No further restrictions on the amount of Gargantuan Creatures per army or team
b) Restrictive amount of Gargantuan Creatures per army or team

7 A ; 31 B

12. Only valid if option 11b was chosen
a) restrictions based on amount of GC on the team or army level
b) restrictions based on the type of GC on the team or army level

32 A ; 4 B

13. only valid if option 12a was chosen
a) Restrict amount of Gargantuans on the team level – see question 14
b) Restrict amount of Gargantuans on the army level – see question 15

16 A ; 20 B


14. Only valid if option 13a is chosen
a) maximum 1 Gargantuan Creature per team
b) maximum 2 Gargantuan Creatures per team
c) maximum 3 Gargantuan Creatures per team
d) more than 3 allowed per team

13 A ; 1 B ; 8 C ; 12 D



15. Only valid if option 13b is chosen
a) maximum 1 GC per army
b) maximum 2 GC per army
c) maximum 3 GC per army
d) more than 3 allowed per army

26 A ; 1 B ; 2 C ; 6D

16. claryfing vote for vote 15
a) Only 1 Gargantuan Creature of a certain type per army
b) Only 2 Gargantuan Creatures of a certain type per army
c) more than 2 GC of a certain type per army

28 A ; 0 B ; 8 C

17. Only valid if option 10a is chosen
a) No further restrictions on the amount of SHV per army or team
b) Restrictive amount of SHV per army or team

6 A ; 29 B

18. Only valid if option 17b was chosen
a) restrictions based on amount of SHV on the team or army level
b) restrictions based on the type of SHV on the team or army level

30 A ; 7 B

19. only valid if option 18a was chosen
a) Restrict amount of SHV on the team level – see question 20
b) Restrict amount of SHV on the army level – see question 21

14 A ; 21 B

20. Only valid if option 19a is chosen
a) maximum 1 SHV per team
b) maximum 2 SHV per team
c) maximum 3 SHV per team
d) more than 3 allowed per team

10 A ; 1 B ; 8 C ; 14D

21. Only valid if option 19b is chosen
a) maximum 1 SHV per army
b) maximum 2 SHV per army
c) maximum 3 SHV per army
d) more than 3 allowed per army

17 A ; 1 B ; 4 C ; 14D

22. claryfing vote for vote 21
a) Only 1 SHV of a certain type per army
b) Only 2 SHV of a certain type per army
c) more than 2 SHV of a certain type per army

21 A ; 0 B ; 16 C

23. Will we allow Dataslates at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

36 A ; 2 B

24. Will we allow White Dwarf Entries at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

29 A ; 9 B

25. Will we allow online only formations like the Skyhammer Formation at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

26 A ; 12 B

26. Will we allow the use of Campain Book entries at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

31 A ; 8 B

27. Will we allow the use of Escalation book entries at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

17 A ; 21 B

28. Will we allow the use of Stronghold Assault at the ETC
a) Yes *
b) No *
*** Indicate if you would like to have some restrictions in place in case majority decides to go with yes. This will require more votes and discussion

28 A ; 11 B

29. Shall we adjust the pointsize (1850) played at the ETC?
a) Yes
b) No

Q29: 18 A ; 20 B

30. Only valid if 29a was chosen as an option
a) 1750 pts
b) 1650 pts
c) 1500 pts

22 A ; 5 B ; 9 C

31. Use ETC WFB 2015 pairing process ( voir le sujet dédié sur ce forum qui explique cette proposition)
a/ yes
b/ no, use ETC 40k 2015 pairing process

14 A ; 10 B

32. Add terrain (je pense qu'il voulait dire "table") choice by players who have been put forward in the WFB pairing process
a/ yes
b/ no
As soon as this vote is over, a new vote will be set up to discuss the fineprint from vote 23-30, as well as votes around missiondesign and the pairing process.

12 A ; 11 B


Merci aux participants pour vos avis.
Le vote France sera fait sur cette base.
avatar
arc_ange

Messages : 822
Date d'inscription : 18/12/2011
Age : 33
Localisation : Cognac

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par arc_ange le Dim 13 Sep - 9:52

Merci pour la compil Mad!

Edit: réponse dans l'autre sujet! Smile

Contenu sponsorisé

Re: Passons aux choses sérieuses : vote sur le futur format.

Message par Contenu sponsorisé

  • Poster un nouveau sujet
  • Répondre au sujet

La date/heure actuelle est Mer 18 Oct - 1:57