[ETC 2014 Vote 1] - Codex Restrictions

Forum ETC UK (Captains) a écrit:Vote for Codex/supplement for ETC 2014 (vote ends 5th Nov)
This vote is designed to clarify what codex and supplements can be used for 40K ETC 2014.

-------------------------------------------------Ground Rules------------------------------------------------------------
->Only the captains can vote (other posts will be deleted)
->Captains must include their signature to state their nation eg 40K Antarctica (posts without signatures will be deleted).
->The vote ends on Tuesday 5th November at 23:59 (CET)

-------------------------------------------------Who can vote----------------------------------------------------------

40K
Australia
Austria
Belarus
Belgium
Czech Republic
Denmark
England
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Malta
Netherlands
Northern Ireland
Norway
Poland
Romania
Russia
Scotland
Serbia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
Ukraine
United States
Wales

-------------------------------------------------Questions----------------------------------------------------------
Question 1:
Do we allow the codex supplements at ETC 2014? Yes/No

Question 2:
Do we adhere to a strict policy of each codex only once? Yes/No
To Clarify:
Yes: each armybook (and/or supplement) can only appear once in each Team's roster
No: each armybook (and/or supplement, see votes below) can appear once as main and once as ally slot

Question 3:
If codex supplements are allowed, do we allow Teams to field the Main Codex and each of its supplements as a seperate army? eg Can a team have Codex Eldar and its Iyanden supplement in its roster? Yes/No
To clarify:
No: Teams have to choose to have either the main codex or one of its supplements, never both.
Yes: Teams can take both the codex and each of it supplements once in their roster.

Question 4:
If codex supplements are allowed, do we allow each Codex/supplement to be used once as a main force and once as an ally? Yes/No

Question 5:
If codex and its supplements are specifically given permission to do so: can they ally with each other eg codex Tau with supplement Farsight? Yes/No

Question 6:
Can mirror combinations for main force and ally be used eg each one list with Tau with Eldar allies and a second list Eldar with Tau allies? Yes/No
To Clarify:
A supplement codex is to be considered the same as the parent codex in this case. So no Lyanden/Tau and Eldar/Farsight for instance.

I think we covered all possibilities with this questionaire. Please ring the bell if we forgot something, or if there's an oversight!

Wilme a écrit:Question 1: Yes

Question 2: No
(No: each armybook (and/or supplement, see votes below) can appear once as main and once as ally slot)

Question 3: No
(No: Teams have to choose to have either the main codex or one of its supplements, never both)

Question 4:
If codex supplements are allowed, do we allow each Codex/supplement to be used once as a main force and once as an ally? Yes/No

Question 5: Yes

Question 6: No
A supplement codex is to be considered the same as the parent codex in this case. So no Lyanden/Tau and Eldar/Farsight for instance.

Question 3:
If codex supplements are allowed, do we allow Teams to field the Main Codex and each of its supplements as a seperate army? eg Can a team have Codex Eldar and its Iyanden supplement in its roster? Yes/No
To clarify:
No: Teams have to choose to have either the main codex or one of its supplements, never both.
Yes: Teams can take both the codex and each of it supplements once in their roster.

Only the captains can vote (other posts will be deleted)

Makai a écrit:

Only the captains can vote (other posts will be deleted)

On va faire un vote au sein du bureau et on prendra ton choix comme un vote.
=>  

Wilme a écrit: le bureau de cette année a été élu sur la base d'un programme à mener, pas parce qu'il représente un échantillon représentatif de la communauté 40K ETC FR sur les autres avis.

Sur ce type de votes soit le bureau FEQ 40K organise un vote démocratique direct + synthèse prêt-à-poster, soit il n'y a pas de consensus ETC FR de synthétisé et je voterai en mon âme est conscience tant que je resterai le capitaine en titre de la sélection FR. Bien évidemment je préfère très largement le premier cas de figure (vote démocratique ouvert) mais ça ne dépend pas de moi.

Codex Supplements allowed. (19-3)
Each armybook/supplement can appear once as main and once as ally slot. (14-
Codex and supplements that are allowed to ally with themselves can do so, but use up the team ally and main slot. (13-9)
No mirror combinations within a team. So no Tau/Eldar and Eldar/Tau.
--> A supplement codex is to be considered the same as the parent codex in this case. So no Lyanden/Tau and Eldar/Farsight for instance.

Teams have to choose to have either the main codex or one of its supplements in their roster, never both. (20-2)

While a supplement is counted as an equivalent of the parent codex, how do we handle using the main codex and/or associated supplement(s) within the pool of armies available for primary and ally forces?

A. Teams may select a main codex/supplement to be used once as a primary army. Teams may select a main codex/supplement to be used once as an ally force. The main codex or supplement chosen as the primary army does not have to be the same as the one selected for the ally force. (ie: This allows Iyanden/xxx and yyy/Eldar or Tau/xxx and yyy/Farsight or SM/SM army combinations).

B. Teams must select either a parent codex or a single associated supplement to count as the codex for both the primary and ally force options. (ie: This only allows Iyanden/xxx and yyy/Iyanden, but not Iyanden/xxx and yyy/Eldar army combinations). Teams have to choose either the main codex or one of its supplements for their team, never both.